I'm so sorry for you.It's so weird... this was only minutes from my house, and I know of so many connections to the victims... I haven't slept or ate well in days. One of the professors is the mother of one of these children, my cousin goes to Sandy Hook, my friend from work went to Sandy Hook and lives directly down the street, and the Principal who died graduated from my college. It's just so surreal, and still hasn't sunk in. Hearing Connecticut on the news so much for all the wrong reasons is just so hard to take in...
This all just really sucks.
Yamiche Alcindor @Yamiche
A letter 6-year-old Jack Pinto's best friend wrote him. #Newtown#SandyHook pic.twitter.com/KbhIpoCk
Top Conservative Publication: Shooting Occurred Because Women Ran The School | ThinkProgress
Stuff like this are awful.
Conservatives are blaming gays, people who support equality, the existence of working women, children not owning & using guns, 'kicking God out of schools', and just today I read one saying it's because we teach science/evolution in schools! They're just totally using this incident to just go against everything they dislike.
Ok, so the National Review wrote an article. The National Review isn't the only 'Top Conservative Publication'. I trust you didn't post this article to portray all conservatives in one category and all liberals in one category.
Well tbh I don't know the National Review until I read this, not that I know what the top conservative publications are. But witnessing thoughts like this emerging from minds to actually be organized & written, and then be published is already sad.
Tbh, that is what I thought, however I just wanted to be sure and I agree the author of the National Review article is -- well, I won't say -- and for the powers that be to allow the article to be published is more than sad --
EDIT: While I no longer work in Washington, D.C., I was shocked that this supposed article came from the National Review -- I thought ok, I've really lost touch with what they write, therefore I decided to investigate this because I just couldn't believe the "National Review" would write the article mentioned in the article you posted. As it turns out, there was an article in the National Review entitled "Newtown Answers - An NRO Symposium". There are 7 pages and there are many people who wrote on "Newtown Answers" -- it just so happens that the first person on the list, after a short introduction regarding the article by National Review, is Charlotte Allen, author of The Human Christ (and I do not know of this book at all and I don't want to know quite frankly). These 'views' are listed in alphabetical order of the person who wrote each one. While you may or may not agree with the other writers on this Symposium -- NONE of them say the things this woman said at all. In my opinion, this person should not have been included in this smyposium -- however the article was not written by the National Review.
In any event, here is the article in full if you would like to read it:
Newtown Answers - NRO Symposium - National Review Online
I truly wasn't trying to pick a fight with you or say anything disrespectful and I hope you did not take it that way -- if you did, I apologize. I used to read many, many publications from all sides of issues or tragedies or whatever was going on in the world when I worked in D.C. and I just found it surprising that the National Review would write such an article as was mentioned in your post. In my opinion, it was misleading to say the National Review wrote that article. Oh well...again, if you felt I was out of line in my first post to you, I am very sorry because I certainly did not mean to be.
I wasn't offended or upset by your response to my first post at all. If my tone had been negative I want to make sure you know nothing was directed to you. I was/am just sad about the whole situation, especially with twisted opinions being thrown out which surely have worsened the whole situation.
Thank you for the link. I certainly don't fully agree with all the other people but I definitely agree that there wasn't anything as outrageous as the first one. Even though one of the articles did try to, for some reason, blame the existence of abortion. And it seems there was one trying to equate watching porns to shooting children...But anyways.
It isn't very accurate to say they wrote the articles, but they did make the editorial decisions.
Does anyone else think that Ann is the nicest person in the world? Seriously, you're part-angel, part-kitten, part-rainbow, part-unicorn and part-sprinkles!
Now I apologize for going OT. And giving y'all cavities :')