teesharky
Well-known member
Agree. Some of the movies they pan were top notch enjoyable. Sometimes they get it right and the duds deserve all the hate. haha But, there have been many many times that they got it wrong.
I agree with them completely about such films as Dunkirk, SlumDog Millionaire, The Revenant, The English Patient, etc. But some of their favs baffle me as they are dreadfully boring like The Hurt Locker.
I agree with them completely about such films as Dunkirk, SlumDog Millionaire, The Revenant, The English Patient, etc. But some of their favs baffle me as they are dreadfully boring like The Hurt Locker.
Tee, you mentioned something about agreeing/disagreeing with critics earlier. I used to always say if the critics liked it I wouldn't and if they hated I would like it. But over the past few years I have agreed with critics a lot. I go on Rotten Tomatoes a lot to decide if I want to see a film. So I am gradually upgrading my favorite movies from DVD to Bluray, rewatching them along the way. I looked at RT and Metacritic and was shocked to see some movies I thought were universal favorites not receiving great reviews. I still love the movies after 20+ years but it amazes me how some critics panned them. I went on a Julia Roberts binge so I'm referring to Sleeping With The Enemy, The Pelican Brief, and shock... even Pretty Woman, to me, one of the greatest movies ever!
Have critics gotten better over the years? Because I tend to agree with them a lot more now. Maybe they're less snotty and will acknowledge that not every movie has to be a Schindler's List?